Beefs.
Internet & Culture
Logan PaulCoffeezilla in 2022 in a Podcast at Decoding the Gurus, Timestamp: 30:01. Upscaled.

Logan PaulCoffeezilla

Photo — Logan Paul: Logan Paul (CC BY 2.0) · Coffeezilla: Decoding the Gurus (CC BY 3.0)

Internet & Culture·Cooling Off·Since 2023
Beef Score measures the intensity and public prominence of a dispute. It does not indicate who is right.Factors considered·Heat·Public attention·Escalation·LongevityCurrently assigned editorially, not computed.

The Short Version

A creator-versus-investigator dispute. In the sample scenario, an investigative YouTuber publishes a series alleging that a crypto game promoted by a large creator was misrepresented to buyers. The creator initially threatens legal action and disputes the framing, then withdraws the threat and announces a buy-back programme. The investigator's claims are presented as reporting; the creator's response is presented as his denial. It matters because it is one of the clearer examples of independent online reporting changing a creator's behaviour.

Latest Development

Buy-back programme announced

Sample record: Paul announced a programme to buy back assets from purchasers. He did not concede the underlying allegations.

January 13, 2023 · Public statement

The Beef

Chronological, newest first. Every entry cites a source.

Beef timeline

  1. January 13, 2023

    Buy-back programme announced

    Public statement

    Sample record: Paul announced a programme to buy back assets from purchasers. He did not concede the underlying allegations.

    Sample Creator Statement ↗

  2. January 6, 2023

    Legal threat issued, then withdrawn

    Denial

    Sample record: Paul published a video threatening legal action and disputing the framing, then removed it and withdrew the threat days later.

    Sample Creator Statement ↗

  3. January 3, 2023

    Investigative series published

    Reported

    Sample record: Coffeezilla published a series alleging a crypto game promoted by Paul had been misrepresented to buyers. The claims are the investigator's reporting.

    Sample Investigative Channel ↗

Where It Stands

Cooling Off. The legal threat was withdrawn and a refund programme was announced. The underlying allegations were never tested in court.

Compare these two Beef networks →

Related Beefs

Same people, same category.

JDTW

James Charles DickinsonTati Westbrook

Internet & Culture·Resolved

In April and May 2019, a public dispute arose between YouTube beauty creators James Charles Dickinson and Tati Westbrook after Charles promo…

◆Beef Score8018 days ago
Laura Loomer speaking with attendees at a "No Eminent Domain! No Carbon Pipelines!" rally at the Iowa State Capitol in Des Moines, Iowa. Please attribute to Gage Skidmore if used elsewhere.Candace Owens speaking at the 2018 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in National Harbor, Maryland. Please attribute to Gage Skidmore if used elsewhere.

Laura LoomerCandace Owens

Internet & Culture·Active

Far-right political commentator Laura Loomer and conservative podcaster Candace Owens engaged in a sustained public feud across social media…

◆Beef Score7222 days ago
ACFrom video desc: GUYS I will never get over this week in LA! I was so honored to be invited to the Amazon Influencer Spring Favorites event at the iconic Beverly Hills Hotel! I got to meet so many amazing people + some of my favorite content creators that I had been following since high school. We m

Alexandra CooperAlix Earle

Internet & Culture·Active

A public dispute between podcaster Alex Cooper and influencer Alix Earle emerged following Earle's departure from Cooper's Unwell Network, c…

◆Beef Score7118 days ago

Sources

  1. 1.Sample Creator StatementBuy-back programme announced · Jan 13, 2023
  2. 2.Sample Creator StatementLegal threat issued, then withdrawn · Jan 6, 2023
  3. 3.Sample Investigative ChannelInvestigative series published · Jan 3, 2023

Allegations are attributed to the party that made them and are not statements of fact.